The Cynefin Framework: Strategic Navigation for Leadership
Dave Snowden developed the Cynefin framework over 25 years ago,¹ and it remains highly relevant given the complexity and sense-making required in today’s AI-driven environments. In the next three minutes, I will explain the framework and its significance as concisely as possible, so let’s get started.
Understanding Cynefin: A Model for Sense-Making
According to the Wikipedia entry, Cynefin is a “sense-making device” designed to help leaders understand their operational context before making decisions.² The Welsh term “Cynefin” (pronounced kuh-NEV-in), meaning ‘habitat,’ underscores that context, shaped by unique histories and environments, is paramount.³ This emphasis on preliminary sense-making positions Cynefin as a crucial cognitive aid for refining judgment; an inaccurate perception of a problem’s nature can lead to flawed strategies.¹
Cynefin has five domains: Clear, Complicated, Complex, Chaotic, and a central domain,¹ each with a fundamental distinction between Ordered Domains (Clear, Complicated: cause-effect known or discoverable) and Unordered Domains (Complex, Chaotic: cause-effect only retrospective or unknowable).³ This differentiation challenges traditional, linear management approaches often misapplied in dynamic IT and strategic landscapes, enabling leaders to select more suitable tools and mindsets.¹
Why Cynefin Matters for Decision-Making
Cynefin enhances decision quality by guiding leaders to tailor responses to specific contexts, avoiding the misapplication of past successes to new, unsuitable situations, vital when many contemporary challenges exist as “unknown unknowns”.²
For strategic agility, particularly in Complex contexts, it encourages creating “safe spaces for experimentation,” fostering innovation and adaptability.³ This approach enables strategists to tackle “wicked problems” and high market volatility by shifting from prediction to adaptation and pattern recognition, utilising the Probe-Sense-Respond approach to navigate uncertainty through small-scale experiments.²
Cynefin also mitigates risk and optimises resources by aligning problem-solving with the nature of the challenge. For organisational leaders and the architects who provide trusted advice, this provides a rationale for moving beyond methodological dogmatism (for example, using Waterfall software development for Clear or Complicated domains and Agile for Complex ones), linking choices to contextual appropriateness rather than preference.⁴ Adopting Cynefin, especially its tenets for Complex domains, often necessitates cultivating an organisational culture that embraces “learning through safe-to-fail experiments”, which is a significant but essential shift for innovation.²
Cynefin in Practice: From Context to Action
Applying Cynefin starts by diagnosing the current domain.¹ The framework is more complex than the famous diagram. The central domain (variously called Disorder), now called “Aporetic/Confused” in the latest Cynefin framework, represents situations where it is unclear which of the other domains applies, signifying a state of perplexity or diagnostic uncertainty that must be resolved before effective sense-making and action can proceed.⁵ The central domain signifies diagnostic failure; therefore, ambiguity must first be resolved by breaking down the problem to assign parts to other domains.³
Source: Adapted from HBR Article, Leader’s Framework for Decision Making¹
A critical warning involves the “catastrophic failure” shift from the Clear to the Chaotic domain due to complacency or “entrained thinking”.¹ This underscores that active sensing and challenging assumptions are vital even in stable areas to prevent sudden crises. Strategically, organisational challenges, initiatives, or architectural decisions should be mapped to the appropriate domain to guide the approach and foster shared understanding among leadership teams.
Leading with Contextual Intelligence
Cynefin empowers adaptive leadership, enabling executives to navigate uncertainty confidently by matching strategies to problem types and shifting from “one-size-fits-all” to contextually intelligent approaches.¹
For executives, strategists, and architects operating at the complex intersections of technology, business strategy, and enterprise architecture, Cynefin serves as a shared lexicon. It streamlines strategic conversations and collaborative problem-solving by reducing misunderstandings stemming from differing assumptions (mental models) about a problem’s fundamental nature, fostering a sense of alignment and shared understanding³.
Further Reading
Snowden, D. J., & Boone, M. E. (2007). A leader’s framework for decision making. Harvard Business Review, 85(11), 68–76. https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making
Wikipedia. (2025, June 2). Cynefin framework. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cynefin_framework
Kurtz, C. F., & Snowden, D. J. (2003). The new dynamics of strategy: Sense-making in a complex and complicated world. IBM Systems Journal, 42(3), 462–483. https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.423.0462
Snowden, D. J. (2010). The origins of Cynefin. Cognitive Edge White Paper. https://www.cognitive-edge.com/the-origins-of-cynefin/
The Cynefin Co. (2024). Aporetic Meditations. https://thecynefin.co/aporetic-meditations/
Thanks for reading!
If you enjoyed this, you’ll love the ideas in my other articles. Feel free to share this newsletter with a colleague.
